What’s the buzz about Manuka honey?
January 29, 2021 | 3 min read
The UK Advertising Standards Authority (UK ASA) recently ruled on an advertisement for Manuka honey, after a complainant challenged whether references throughout the ad to honey as a treatment for coughs and its “anti-microbial” properties breached the rule against stating or implying that a food can prevent, treat or cure human disease.
Key takeaways:
|
What happened?
The advertisement generally linked Manuka honey to the treatment of coughs, through claims such as “honey should be the first line of treatment for patients with a cough” and “honey can help with the symptoms”.
While the advertiser agreed that Manuka honey could not prevent, treat or cure human disease, it argued that a cough was not a disease, nor could all coughs be linked to diseases. The advertiser also argued that the advertisement echoed official government advice to use honey for coughs.
In relation to the anti-microbial claim, the advertiser provided substantiation evidence (a peer reviewed scientific journal article) demonstrating that anti-microbial properties were indeed found in Manuka honey.
The UK ASA decision
The UK ASA upheld the complaint, stating that:
- Coughs are a symptom of a range of diseases and adverse health conditions. Therefore, claims that Manuka honey may treat coughs were claims that a food could prevent, treat or cure human disease. In addition, the ad’s references to public concerns about Covid-19 and Manuka honey as a “simple form of self-treatment that has government backing” would result in consumers understanding references to coughs in the ad as references to a symptom of Covid-19 in particular.
- Claims referring to anti-microbial qualities in Manuka honey would give consumers reasonable grounds to believe that the product would kill harmful microorganisms, therefore having the potential to prevent, treat or cure human diseases caused by such microorganisms. Because such a claim was prohibited, the UK ASA did not assess the evidence submitted to substantiate the claim.
What does this mean for me?
The New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority Codes of Practice (NZ ASA Codes) requires all advertising to be truthful, balanced and not misleading. In particular, food and beverage claims must be factual and substantiated, which includes not exaggerating the benefits foods and beverages. All advertisements must also be prepared with a due sense of social responsibility.
While the NZ ASA Codes do not contain a prohibition similar to that of the UK ASA, it may be that claims similar to the Manuka honey claims above could be considered in breach, on the basis that they are not truthful, unsubstantiated and/or not prepared with a due sense of responsibility (particularly in light of the pandemic).
It also worth noting that therapeutic claims in respect of foods in New Zealand are not permitted from a legal perspective. Standard 1.2.7 of the ANZ Food Standards Code (Food Code) specifically provides that claims must not refer to the prevention, diagnosis, cure or alleviation of a disease, disorder or condition. The Medicines Act 1981 (enforced by Medsafe) may also be triggered by claims that suggest or imply that the product concerned has a therapeutic purpose. Under both the Food Code and Medicines Act, re-labelling, product reformulation and monetary penalties could arise.
Get in touch
If you are unsure about your product claims, labels, advertisements or classification, or if you have any questions about this article, please get in touch with one of our contacts (pictured right).
Contacts
